<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Experience Blog &#187; Group policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theexperienceblog.com/category/group-policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com</link>
	<description>A blog with focus on experiences with the Windows Client operating systems...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:57:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HOW TO: Handle user group policy settings in multiple OS environments</title>
		<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2011/12/22/how-to-handle-user-group-policy-settings-in-multiple-os-environments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2011/12/22/how-to-handle-user-group-policy-settings-in-multiple-os-environments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Stenhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Active Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loopback processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexperienceblog.com/?p=862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very common question and one that I would say all companies migrating to Windows 7 has experienced. The scenario is how do we handle user group policy settings when we have multiple operating systems such as Windows XP and Windows 7 or in the future also introduce Windows 8? First I strongly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very common question and one that I would say all companies migrating to Windows 7 has experienced. The scenario is how do we handle user group policy settings when we have multiple operating systems such as Windows XP and Windows 7 or in the future also introduce Windows 8?</p>
<p>First I strongly recommend that you do not reuse the user configuration for Windows XP for Windows 7. Group policies tend to grow over time and at most customers I have encountered a lot of rubbish in the old configuration. Starting over and migrating only what is needed minimize the risk for problem and makes the configuration slicker and more easy to manage in the long run.</p>
<p>But how do we make sure that users get one configuration when they log in to for instance Windows XP and another configuration when they log in to a Windows 7 or Windows 8 machine? Well, let&#8217;s have a look at the options including pros and cons followed by recommendations from the field.</p>
<p><strong>1. Security group filtering</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Pros:<br />
- Require no change in OU structure/move of users.</li>
<li>Cons:<br />
- Requires a lot of management and make it hard to administer.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>2. Separate users into a new and old OU</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Pros:<br />
- Easy to do if you have very few users and no dependencies to other services or applications.</li>
<li>Cons:<br />
- Not a manageable solution in an environment with many users.<br />
- There are often apps or services that rely on the users being in a certain OU which is making it hard to move users without affecting other services.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>3. WMI filters</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Pros:<br />
- Keep the users in the OU they are today not affecting other services or apps that rely on users being in a certain OU.<br />
- A longterm investment in making it easy to introduce new operating system versions.<br />
- Quick determination (WMI is often known to be real slow but this particular query is not performance intensive).</li>
<li>Cons:<br />
- Need changes for existing environment, i.e. for instance Windows XP user configuration.<br />
- Could make group policies not being applied due to problems with WMI repository or related services.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>4. Loopback processing</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Pros:<br />
- Keep the users in the OU they are today not affecting other services or apps that rely on users being in a certain OU.<br />
- Very reliable solution.</li>
<li>Cons:<br />
- If not Replace mode is used you need to handle current configuration.<br />
- Might become a mess to troubleshoot and maintain if naming and config is not done consistent and clear.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Recommendations from the field</strong></p>
<p>In my professional opinion the only real alternatives are WMI filters or loopback processing and sometimes I recommend WMI filters for separating user settings depending on what operating system they are logging in to and sometimes I recommend loopback processing. It depends on the environment and needs for the customer. Many times moving the user accounts around is not an alternative but consider that a very good alternative if possible to accomplish.</p>
<p><strong>How do I implement it in my environment?</strong></p>
<p><strong>1. WMI filters</strong></p>
<p>In the Group Policy console you create multiple WMI filters for for instance Windows XP and Windows 7. You then set each WMI filter respectively on each GPO containing user settings for each operating system. NOTE: Always test it out before applying this configuration to your existing environment. Also note that this does not affect performance to any noticeable amount of time.</p>
<p>Windows XP:</p>
<p><code>SELECT * FROM Win32_OperatingSystem WHERE Version LIKE "5.2%" AND ProductType ="1"</code></p>
<p>Windows 7:</p>
<p><code>SELECT * FROM Win32_OperatingSystem WHERE Version LIKE "6.1%" AND ProductType ="1"</code></p>
<p>Windows 8:</p>
<p><code>SELECT * FROM Win32_OperatingSystem WHERE Version LIKE "6.2%" AND ProductType ="1"</code></p>
<p>Basically the version is the OS version as we know it and the ProductType=1 means that it is a client operating system.</p>
<p>So you will end with for instance one GPO named &#8220;User Configuration &#8211; Windows 7&#8243; which have the WMI filter for Windows 7 machines set and one GPO named &#8220;User Configuration &#8211; Windows XP&#8221; which have the WMI filter for Windows XP set.</p>
<p><strong>2. Loopback processing</strong></p>
<p>A prerequisite for using loopback processing is that you keep computers in separate OUs, for instance XP computer accounts in one OU and Windows 7 computer accounts in another OU.</p>
<p>You then create GPO objects in the OU for Windows 7 in our example and configure the user settings there. As I think you should always separate Computer and User configuration GPO:s I would say that you in a Computer configuration policy in that same OU set this setting for the user settings to be applied when users log into Windows 7 machines:</p>
<p>Policies &#8211; Computer configuration &#8211; Administrative templates &#8211; System &#8211; Group Policy and there set &#8220;User Group Policy loopback processing mode&#8221; to Replace or Merge, depending on what you want to achieve and how you want to handle your current configuration. Replace mode is recommended as you will have a hard time maintaining and troubleshooting the configuration otherwise.</p>
<p>Done! When users log on to your Windows 7 machines they will get the user settings you have defined in the user configuration GPOs located in the Windows 7 machines OU in our example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2011/12/22/how-to-handle-user-group-policy-settings-in-multiple-os-environments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Handling the Group Policy central store with care</title>
		<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2011/04/18/handling-the-group-policy-central-store-with-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2011/04/18/handling-the-group-policy-central-store-with-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Stenhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Active Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADMX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SYSVOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexperienceblog.com/?p=820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I visited a customer site where the customer had setup a central store, meaning all group policy defintion files and language files are placed in the SYSVOL share for better management of group policies. One benefit of that central store is that all administrators managing and editing group policies are using the same templates. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I visited a customer site where the customer had setup a central store, meaning all group policy defintion files and language files are placed in the SYSVOL share for better management of group policies. One benefit of that central store is that all administrators managing and editing group policies are using the same templates.</p>
<p>The problem in this case was that whenever they started editing a group policy they got tens and tens of warning about various admx files along with for example resource errors. I looked into PolicyDefinitions folder in the SYSVOL share and immediately noticed that there was admx and adml files missing and that there were mismatch between the version of the admx and adml files.</p>
<p>I took a Windows 7 with SP1 client and added/replaced all admx files from there. After that I took the en-us folder and replaced what was in the SYSVOL folder with that one, followed by doing the same for the sv-se, i.e. the Swedish language files. While at it I installed IE9 and put in the inetres.admx and respective adml files for each language to have the capabilities of editing Internet Explorer 9 policies as that is to be included in the Windows 7 image. Voila!</p>
<p>So the bottom line is; keep the central store consistent and make sure that when you create the store that you populate it with admx and adml files from the latest client OS with service pack when managing Windows 7, and that you do make sure that you have the same version of all admx and adml files or else you will get errors due to mismatching files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2011/04/18/handling-the-group-policy-central-store-with-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case of &#8220;catastrophic failure&#8221; and error 0x8000ffff with Group Policy Preferences mapping printers</title>
		<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2011/04/07/case-of-catastrophic-failure-and-error-0x8000ffff-with-group-policy-preferences-mapping-printers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2011/04/07/case-of-catastrophic-failure-and-error-0x8000ffff-with-group-policy-preferences-mapping-printers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Stenhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Group policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group Policy Preferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexperienceblog.com/?p=805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mapping printers using Group Policy Preferences is a really nice feature and it is supposed to be working much better than using traditional scripting technologies. Let me tell you about an interesting day troubleshooting why printers didn’t want to map using Group Policy Preferences. In the logs it just stated &#8220;catastrophic failure&#8221; which does not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mapping printers using Group Policy Preferences is a really nice feature and it is supposed to be working much better than using traditional scripting technologies. Let me tell you about an interesting day troubleshooting why printers didn’t want to map using Group Policy Preferences. In the logs it just stated &#8220;catastrophic failure&#8221; which does not sound good at all nor makes much sense.</p>
<p><code>Log Name: Application<br />
Source: Group Policy Printers<br />
Event ID: 4098<br />
Description: The user 'X' preference item in the 'Y {3EE4E80F-17CB-4E56-9237-4FC8B9FA090A}' Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code '0x8000ffff Catastrophic failure' This error was suppressed.</code></p>
<p>Logging in as the user on another machine did not produce the same problem and the mapping of printers work fine, as did mapping the printers when logging in using an administrator account.</p>
<p>This got me thinking that I should try mapping a printer manually as the standard user so I did. It got me a &#8220;You do not have permission to use the selected printer&#8221; which made me turn to the classic tool Process Monitor and to start a trace. It didn&#8217;t take long to see that after filtering all logs for a result of &#8220;denied&#8221; resulted in the following line:</p>
<p><code>Operation: CreateFile<br />
Result: ACCESS DENIED<br />
Path: <a href="file://printserver/print$/w32x86/3/OPLO_UM.dll">\\printserver\print$\w32x86\3\OPLO_UM.dll</a><br />
Desired access: Generic Read</code></p>
<p>Note that CreateFile does not necessarily mean to create a file, it can mean &#8220;read file&#8221; as documented by Microsoft for the CreateFile function. </p>
<p>So the conclusion was that after investigating with the printer department the printer share &#8220;print$&#8221; security permissions did not match the user and the user actually did not have read permissions to read the driver which is an absolute requirement for the printer to be mapped (as the print driver is actually installed when the printer is mapped).</p>
<p>Also one setting that affected the behavior was that one have to set &#8220;<strong>Run in logged-on user&#8217;s security context</strong>&#8221; in the Common tab of the printer mapping Properties. This is an essential part of the solution&#8230;</p>
<p>Case closed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2011/04/07/case-of-catastrophic-failure-and-error-0x8000ffff-with-group-policy-preferences-mapping-printers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Group policies messing with your Windows 7 deployment</title>
		<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2010/10/15/group-policies-messing-with-your-windows-7-deployment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2010/10/15/group-policies-messing-with-your-windows-7-deployment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Stenhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexperienceblog.com/?p=734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There a number of group policies that can interfere when you are deploying Windows 7 machines, one of them being the &#8220;Admin approval mode for the built-in local administrator account&#8221; which if set to enabled breaks deployment using the Lite Touch scenario using Microsoft Deployment Toolkit. My fellow MVP and now also colleague Johan Arwidmark has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There a number of group policies that can interfere when you are deploying Windows 7 machines, one of them being the &#8220;Admin approval mode for the built-in local administrator account&#8221; which if set to enabled breaks deployment using the Lite Touch scenario using Microsoft Deployment Toolkit.</p>
<p>My fellow MVP and now also colleague Johan Arwidmark has a <a href="http://www.deployvista.com/Home/tabid/36/EntryID/147/language/sv-SE/Default.aspx">blog post on two methods for handling problems related to group policies when dpeloying machines</a>, either by settings filters on your group policies or postponing the domain join process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2010/10/15/group-policies-messing-with-your-windows-7-deployment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Killing the myths: Group Policy Preferences for everyone!</title>
		<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2010/09/20/killing-the-myths-group-policy-preferences-is-for-everyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2010/09/20/killing-the-myths-group-policy-preferences-is-for-everyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Stenhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Group policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexperienceblog.com/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a very common misconception out there that Group Policy Preferences can only be created, managed and applied to your Windows machines if you are running your domain controllers with Windows Server 2008 or later. This is so NOT true. What you have to do if you are stuck on domain controllers running Windows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a very common misconception out there that Group Policy Preferences can only be created, managed and applied to your Windows machines if you are running your domain controllers with Windows Server 2008 or later. This is so NOT true. </p>
<p>What you have to do if you are stuck on domain controllers running Windows Server 2003 is to install the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=7d2f6ad7-656b-4313-a005-4e344e43997d">Remote Server Administration Tools</a> on a Windows 7 (or Vista) client machine, add the feature Group Policy Management and then create a GPO in the domain and edit it, configuring the Group Policy Preferences of your choice. Voilà!</p>
<p>I do not know where this myth is coming from actually but the fact that GPO Preferences were introduced in Windows Server 2008 is the major reason I would assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2010/09/20/killing-the-myths-group-policy-preferences-is-for-everyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Easier GPO management using filtering</title>
		<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2009/06/25/easier-gpo-management-using-filtering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2009/06/25/easier-gpo-management-using-filtering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Stenhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Group policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexperienceblog.com/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of group policy settings that you can use to fine tune your client and server computers are constantly growing. The more settings there are the harder it is to find them. Therefore the option &#8220;All settings&#8221; in the Group Policy Manager in Windows Vista SP1 and later and Windows 7 is a pleasure. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number of group policy settings that you can use to fine tune your client and server computers are constantly growing. The more settings there are the harder it is to find them. Therefore the option &#8220;All settings&#8221; in the Group Policy Manager in Windows Vista SP1 and later and Windows 7 is a pleasure. But the best part is that you can filter out and only show polices related to exactly what you are looking for, example only settings that contain &#8220;DNS&#8221; to see settings only related to DNS.</p>
<p>Start gpedit.msc or the full Group Policy manager which is a part of Remote Server Administration Tools for Windows Vista and Windows 7 and go to Computer Configuration &gt; (Policies &gt;) Administrative templates and click &#8220;All settings&#8221;. Right click anywhere in the right pane to filter out only settings that you are interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2009/06/25/easier-gpo-management-using-filtering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Add users to local groups on the Windows clients easily</title>
		<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2009/05/27/add-users-to-local-groups-on-the-windows-clients-easily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2009/05/27/add-users-to-local-groups-on-the-windows-clients-easily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Stenhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Group policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexperienceblog.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to add domain users or groups to a local group on a Windows client machine automatically, this can be done using group policies. One reason could be to easily put groups or users to the local group Remote Desktop Users to allow them to log on via RDP. To control which users [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to add domain users or groups to a local group on a Windows client machine automatically, this can be done using group policies. One reason could be to easily put groups or users to the local group Remote Desktop Users to allow them to log on via RDP. To control which users or groups you want to add create a new GPO in the domain and go to Computer configuration &gt; (Policies) &gt; Windows settings &gt; Security settings &gt; Restricted groups.</p>
<p>Once there choose to add a group and in my example find the &#8220;Remote Desktop Users&#8221; group and after that add the user or group you want to add to the local machines which that particular group policy object applies to. More information about restricted groups can be found at <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/?id=810076">http://support.microsoft.com/?id=810076</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2009/05/27/add-users-to-local-groups-on-the-windows-clients-easily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Filtering policies in new Group Policy management tool</title>
		<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2008/05/04/filtering-policies-in-new-group-policy-management-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2008/05/04/filtering-policies-in-new-group-policy-management-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 22:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Stenhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Group policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista Service Pack 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexperienceblog.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you install Vista Service Pack 1 the old GPMC.MSC control panel is removed. The reason for this is that there is a new and improved Group Policy management tool released in the Remote Server Administration Tool kit that was released slightly after Service Pack 1 was released to the public. One of the new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you install Vista Service Pack 1 the old GPMC.MSC control panel is removed. The reason for this is that there is a new and improved Group Policy management tool released in the Remote Server Administration Tool kit that was released slightly after Service Pack 1 was released to the public.</p>
<p>One of the new features of the new Group Policy management tool is that you can filter policy settings. Directly under &#8220;Administrative templates&#8221; for both Computer and User Configuration there is a new &#8220;All settings&#8221; category which lists all settings in &#8220;Administrative templates&#8221;. If you select &#8220;All settings&#8221; you might then right click anywhere and choose &#8220;Filter options&#8221;. It looks like the screenshot below.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.theexperienceblog.com/resources/gpofiltering.png" alt="Group Policy Filtering" width="511" height="606" /></p>
<p>By entering the information you are looking for it is very easy to find the group policy settings that you are looking for. This is becoming more and more necessary as the number of policies grows by hundreds or nearly a thousand for every new Windows version released and it is hard to find the setting one is looking for.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=9FF6E897-23CE-4A36-B7FC-D52065DE9960" target="_blank">Download Remote Server Administration Tools (x86)</a><br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=D647A60B-63FD-4AC5-9243-BD3C497D2BC5" target="_blank">Download Remote Server Administration Tools (x64)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2008/05/04/filtering-policies-in-new-group-policy-management-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turn off UAC in a domain using Group Policies</title>
		<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2008/03/30/turn-off-uac-in-a-domain-using-group-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2008/03/30/turn-off-uac-in-a-domain-using-group-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Stenhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Group policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Account Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2008/03/30/turn-off-uac-in-a-domain-using-group-policies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people for whatever reason want to turn off UAC for all or certain computers in a domain using Group Policies. This is done by setting the Computers Configuration &#62; Windows Settings &#62; Local Policies &#62; Security Options &#62; User Account Control: Run all administrators in Admin Approval Mode to disabled. As usual when turning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people for whatever reason want to turn off UAC for all or certain computers in a domain using Group Policies. This is done by setting the Computers Configuration &gt; Windows Settings &gt; Local Policies &gt; Security Options &gt; User Account Control: Run all administrators in Admin Approval Mode to <em>disabled</em>. As usual when turning off UAC a reboot is required for the changes to take effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2008/03/30/turn-off-uac-in-a-domain-using-group-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Setting Microsoft Update to be default using a script</title>
		<link>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2007/11/02/setting-microsoft-update-to-be-default-using-a-script/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2007/11/02/setting-microsoft-update-to-be-default-using-a-script/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Stenhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Group policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2007/11/02/setting-microsoft-update-to-be-default-using-a-script/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Update in Windows Vista is wrapped in a regular window in the operating system itself rather than being opened as a web page in Internet Explorer 7. The basics are the same and it is the same underlying components in both Windows Vista and when you run Windows Update in a browser window on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Update in Windows Vista is wrapped in a regular window in the operating system itself rather than being opened as a web page in Internet Explorer 7. The basics are the same and it is the same underlying components in both Windows Vista and when you run Windows Update in a browser window on for instance Windows XP. Never mind, on a Vista client computer set to connect to a WSUS (Windows Server Update Services) server it will of course always check for updates there. In the Windows Update control panel on a client computer you can however choose to alternatively search for updates on Windows Update. If you deploy other software such as Office 2007 you might want to use Microsoft Update instead of Windows Update, to see if there are other updates available for Office and other Microsoft products, not only Windows.</p>
<p><img border="0" width="502" src="http://www.theexperienceblog.com/resources/vista-windowsupdate.png" alt="Windows Update in Windows Vista" height="290" /></p>
<p>The reason why I want to check Microsoft Update manually from time to time us is to regularly check which updates arrive to the various client computers that can be downloaded separately and then integrated into our installation media. Since opting into Microsoft Update require administrative rights on the computers I want to set Microsoft Update somehow automatically and apparently there are still no GPO settings for this, which I find rather strange. After doing some reserach I have found the solution to automatically set that Microsoft Update will be the default instead of Windows Update. The script to add is as follows:</p>
<p><font color="#808080">Set ServiceManager = CreateObject(&#8220;Microsoft.Update.ServiceManager&#8221;)<br />
ServiceManager.ClientApplicationID = &#8220;My App&#8221;<br />
</font><font color="#808080">&#8216;add the Microsoft Update Service, GUID<br />
Set NewUpdateService = ServiceManager.AddService2(&#8220;7971f918-a847-4430-9279-4a52d1efe18d&#8221;,7,&#8221;")</font></p>
<p>Add this to a startup or login script to make sure Microsoft Update is always default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theexperienceblog.com/2007/11/02/setting-microsoft-update-to-be-default-using-a-script/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

